Common Pitfalls in Quality of Earnings Reports
By Matt Jackson, CPA
By Matt Jackson, CPA
The mistakes we see most often in QoE reports, and why they matter to buyers and lenders.
Normalizing earnings is one of the most important and most subjective aspects of a QofE. Adjustments are intended to remove non-recurring or non-operational items to reflect sustainable earnings power. However, not all adjustments deserve equal confidence.
Common issues include:
The key question is not whether an item is technically non-recurring, but whether the underlying cost or benefit truly disappears after the transaction. Over-normalization can inflate EBITDA and create unrealistic expectations around cash flow.
Revenue recognition policies materially affect earnings quality. Even when accounting treatment complies with standards, aggressive timing or inconsistent application can distort performance.
This risk is particularly pronounced in businesses with:
A QofE should bridge reported revenue to economic reality. Investors should understand when revenue is earned, when cash is collected, and what obligations remain outstanding after revenue is recognized.
Strong earnings do not always imply strong earnings quality. Growth driven by short-term factors can look attractive in a QofE but may not translate into durable cash flow.
Examples include:
Evaluating earnings quality requires understanding the drivers behind performance and distinguishing structural improvements from temporary advantages.
QofE reports are earnings-focused by design, but future cash flow is often affected by obligations that sit outside the income statement.
Potential blind spots include:
These items may not reduce EBITDA but can materially affect cash generation and risk. A QofE should be reviewed alongside balance sheet detail and footnotes, not in isolation.
Trailing twelve-month earnings can obscure meaningful swings in performance. Businesses with seasonal or cyclical demand patterns may appear stable when viewed through a narrow window.
Common challenges include:
Investors should consider multi-period trends and understand how earnings behave across cycles, not just at the time of sale.
Earnings sustainability is closely tied to working capital behavior. Changes in receivables, payables, or inventory can temporarily boost cash flow without improving operations.
Warning signs include:
A QofE should clarify how much working capital the business truly requires to operate at normalized earnings levels.
Management plays a central role in shaping the information that feeds into a QofE. While their insight is valuable, it can also introduce optimism or bias.
Areas to watch include:
Independent diligence requires verifying assumptions and testing narratives against underlying data.
A Quality of Earnings report is not a guarantee against risk. It is a tool to support better decision-making when paired with judgment, skepticism, and operational understanding.
Investors and sponsors are best served when they:
When approached thoughtfully, QofE analysis helps align expectations and reduce surprises. When treated as a formality, it can create misplaced confidence at exactly the wrong time.
Send it over. We answer real questions from real owners.